Sunday, May 24, 2020

The Two Theorists Hume And Kent - 1718 Words

Thomas Johnson The Meaning of Arts Professor Brennan Beauty The two theorists Hume and Kent are basically talking about beauty and what is commonly done in order to enhance beauty. The argument therefore involves two theories, which are talking about the same thing, which is beauty even though they have different thoughts about beauty. They therefore provide a broad and wide definition and also reasons as to why different things are taking place in order to enhance beauty. The two theories are therefore opposing each other to some extent and they also agree with each other to some extent while trying to pass the information about beauty (Freeland, 2001, p.10). This article is therefore going to look at each of the two theories in order to†¦show more content†¦Then it will look at the strengths and weaknesses of each and every theory and it will finally address areas, which are also missing in both of the theories (Freeland, 2001, p.10). . According to Hume’s point of view, any person who has a for the most part highly developed artistic taste assessment of art less valued when it does exult in practices, which are capable of violating the moral standards which are commonly shared. Therefore Hume argues that beauty is not the actual quality of things by themselves but it is an assumption. Beauty therefore exists in a person’s mind that always tends to think about it. Therefore different people with different minds tend to identify a different type of beauty compared to another person’s mind. He also argues that one person might not be able to see beauty where another person is seeing beauty. Therefore each and every person has his own opinions about beauty and ideas, thus no one can be able to think of beauty according to the way another one thinks of beauty. Therefore Hume argues that beauty can only be thought by a person and therefore different people will always have different thoughts about b eauty. Hume therefore points out that beauty is not real but it is what a person thinks it actually is according to his or her own way of thinking. Consequently beauty cannot be the same in different

Thursday, May 14, 2020

U.s. Health Care System - 1142 Words

Introduction U.S. Health Care System Health care systems are organizations that are formed to meet the overall health needs of the population. Health care is regarded as one of the leading cause in promoting not only physical and mental health but the well-being of the population. Legislation is implemented requiring government to offer services to all members of its society. The role of health services and the organizations that provide aid is to focus on the health of an individual and to uphold their human rights. According to WHO (2013), a â€Å"well-functioning health care system requires a robust financing mechanism, a well-trained and adequately-paid workforce, reliable information on which to base decisions and policies, and well maintained facilities and logistics to deliver quality medicines and technologies (World Health Organization; 2013). Financing of Health Care System Financing health services in the United States is very important and involves an excessive amount of health institutions and activities. Health services are supported by several methods to create revenue that most hospital, clinics, and treatment centers use for daily operational costs (World Health Organization, 2006). These methods are: general taxation of the state, county, or township/municipality, Medicare or Medicaid or other socialized health insurance plans, voluntary and private health insurance and lastly, donations to health charities accepted from non-profit organizations, donationsShow MoreRelatedU.s. Health Care System1329 Words   |  6 PagesContrast U.S. Healthcare Policy Compare and Contrast U.S. Healthcare Policy Shaquita Jefferson MHA 620 Dr. Rhonda C. Hatfield August 10, 2015 The Canadian system is often considered the model for the U.S. health care system. Both countries health care systems are very different-Canada has a single-payer, mostly publicly-funded system, while the U.S. has a multi-payer, profoundly private system but both countries appear to be similar and suggesting that it might be possible that the U.S. toRead MoreU.s. Health Care System1233 Words   |  5 PagesThe U.S. health care system is perhaps one of the most complex and plastic industries present within the current world economy. With a projected market sector value of $3,455.1 billion by the end of 2016 the U.S. health care providers market represents a significant portion of the economy (â€Å"Research and Markets; Healthcare Providers in the United States,† 2012). For someone that finds themselves in the position of management it is certainly an orthodox presumption that they incorporate into theirRead MoreU.s. Health Care System1696 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"fixâ₠¬  the U.S. health care system that is supposedly the best in the world? At the time of this program, the U.S. was 37th in the world in terms of fairness and quality (Palfreman, 2008). Other rich countries were ahead of this U.S. in this ranking but were spending a lot less. Frontline’s reporter, T.R. Reid traveled to 5 different countries to examine their health care systems on how this was possible and hopefully come away with any ideas that could potentially help with the U.S. health care systemRead MoreU.s. Health Care System1539 Words   |  7 Pages The U.S. health care system faces challenges that indicate that the people urgently need to be reform. Attention has rightly focused on the approximately 46 million Americans who are uninsured, and on the many insured Americans who face rapid increases in premiums and out-of-pocket costs. As Congress and the Obama administration consider ways to invest new funds to reduce the number of Americans without insurance coverage, we must simultaneously address shortfalls in the quality and efficiency ofRead MoreU.s. Health Care System Essay1600 Words   |  7 Pages1. What is the real and perceived performance of the U.S. health care system? Are the views different among patients, providers, payers, and policy makers? Why or why not? According to Kovner and Knickman (2011), acutely ill patients within the country may hold a positive view of the country’s healthcare system, as the U.S. is scientifically and technology advanced in treating life-threatening injuries and illnesses. Overall quality of healthcare performance, however, is lacking (Kovner Read MoreU.s. Health Care System Essay1124 Words   |  5 PagesThe U.S. health care system is way more complex than what meets the eye. A major difference between the health care system in the U.S. and other nations, is that the U.S. does not have universal health care. Lack of a universal health care opens up the doors for competition amongst insurance, physicians, technology, hospitals and outpatient services. Health care insurance in the U.S. is extremely competitive and not always fair. Recently in 2012, The Affordable Care Act passed by Barack Obama setRead MoreU.s. Health Care System2431 Words   |  10 PagesU.S. Healthcare System On March 23, 2010, the President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) which represents the most significant regulatory that impacts the U.S. healthcare systems. With PPACA, 32 millions of Americans are expected the coverage and expanded access to health care and medical care. Due to the baby boomers and the downfall of the economics, there will be millions of people are seeking for low rates medical care which will create great impact on URead MoreThe U.s. Health Care System886 Words   |  4 PagesThe U.S. Health Care System is very unique; it is mostly based on cultural, social and economic factors. Within the system exists various subsystems of several interrelated and interdependent components. During the process of birthing a Health Care Delivery System, the ultimate goal is to provide a cost effective universal access to all in need. When it comes to the U.S. Health Care Delivery System, compare to other developed countries that are under Na tional Health Insurance programs; the U.S. althoughRead MoreU.s. Health Care System1439 Words   |  6 PagesThe U.S. health care system consumes a huge amount of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product, and is a massive system that provides essential and world-class care to millions of people (Niles, 2016). As a result of this huge burden of cost associated with it, the U.S. healthcare system has been critiqued, and has played a major role in sparking debates about changes to the way the U.S. healthcare system is run and organized. Thus, healthcare has been on the forefront of many American and politician mindsRead MoreU.s. Health Care System1935 Words   |  8 Pages The U.S. health care system faces challenges and it is urgent that the American people become aware of these challenges. There are approximately 46 million Americans who are uninsured, and many insured Americans who face rapid increases in premiums have to pay out-of-pocket costs. As Congress and the Obama administration consider ways to invest new funds to reduce the number of Americans without insurance coverage, people must address shortfalls in the quality and efficiency of care that lead to

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Analysis Of Mr. Hyde By Robert Louis Stevenson

For as long as man has learned to fear, whopping frights have existed. Some of these were entirely born from fables, others based upon biased knowledge of the world. Legends of many ancient beasts survive for a multitude of generations. Of course we realize these humongous horrors are as real as fairy tales, but they serve a greater purpose than to ignite terror in people- they mean to educate. While mere folktales, such as the bogeyman, keep toddlers in bed at night, authors for mature audiences use hellions to teach more valuable lessons. From astronomic leviathans, such as IshirÃ…  Honda s Godzilla who educate about great responsibility, or the plesiosaurus of Ray Bradbury, who give windows into the minds of the lonely, to the horrors of the subconscious, exemplified by Robert Louis Stevenson’s Mr. Hyde, horrors have deeper concepts to them that educate in an allegoric fashion. Human nature has always presented a natural love for fantastic stories, and many elders use thes e parables to disarm listeners and scare the message into them. In IshirÃ…  Honda s original movie, â€Å"Godzilla: King of the Monsters†, destruction of major cities represents how humans should exercise caution with great power. IshirÃ…  Honda develops this theme with a narrator’s dramatic tone and heinous mood. Godzilla existed as a remnant of the cretaceous era, a theropod known as a Godzillasaurus. An infamous kaiju who rises from the Pacific and levels buildings (sometimes battling other gigantic mammoths),Show MoreRelated Analysis of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson2888 Words   |  12 PagesAnalysis of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson In an attempt to consider the duality tale, one narrative inevitably finds its way to the top of the heap as the supreme archetype: Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Immense disagreement permeates the pages of literary criticism relevant to the meaning of the story. Yet, for all of the wrangling focused on the psychology, morality, spirituality, and sociality of the story, itRead MoreAnalysis Of The Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde, By Robert Louis Stevenson1323 Words   |  6 Pagesof Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, by Robert Louis Stevenson, which gives a direct image of what Victorian era was like with his writing style as well as the story itself. Specifically, Stevenson portrays exactly how Victorian social life commenced as well as displays the main points of social standards of the time. Robert Louis Stevenson uses individual characters in the novella to accurately depict how people protected their social standing and reputation during the Victorian era. Mr. Utterson providesRead MoreLiterary Analysis of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde† by Robert Louis Stevenson1530 Words   |  7 Pages1800’s during the Victorian era in this novel. As the story unfolds in the classic literature novel, â€Å"The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde† written by Robert Louis Stevenson, the magnificent city of London becomes a darker and mysterious location. The powerful city of London embodied the freedom and solitude required for the antagonist of the story, Mr. Hyde to hide his wicked behavior from the society as a whole. According to the history of the Victorian age, â€Å"Traditional ways of life wereRead MoreIdeas Of Good And Evil Follow From The Earliest Of Days.847 Words   |  4 Pagesfollow from the earliest of days. Robert Louis Stevenson’s parents lived devout in their Christianity, but Stevenson did not follow their ideas. G.B. Stern suggests that â€Å"Although he had rejected the Calvinist doc trines his parents taught him, the focus of the interplay of good and evil continued to influence his imagination† (Stern). Stevenson forced his parents away, but their ideas stayed in his thoughts and even affected The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. His past affected his writingRead MoreThe Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde1675 Words   |  7 PagesThe Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Essay Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella, â€Å"The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,† is a type of Gothic literature. In the beginning of the story when Stevenson is describing the lawyer, one â€Å"Mr. Utterson,† the mood is a bit dull. At first glance the reader may think that this story would be a bit boring and drab. Stevenson’s story is far from being another dull piece of British English literature. The setting and mood of this novella are more complexRead MoreThe Importance Of Being Earnest By Oscar Wilde1009 Words   |  5 PagesThe play The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde and the novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson showcase the Victorian era. With memorable characters like Aunt Augusta, accustomed to tea time and addicted to her cucumber sandwiches, and the loveable Dr. Jekyll, driven by his own devilish work, one is almost able to hear the trotting of horses with carriages on cobblestone stree ts. While the thought of high society and misty mornings is appealing, bothRead MoreDr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A View Into Societal Changes in the 19th Century1398 Words   |  6 PagesRobert Louis Stevenson was born on November 13, 1850, in the city of Edinburgh, Scotland. Throughout his childhood he was told morbid tales from the Bible, as well as Victorian penny-serial novels that he would carry with him throughout his years and what would place the greatest impact on his writing.[1] In 1886, he published a novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, based on a man with pure intentions, who ends up turning himself into a viscous murderer. Dr. Henry Jekyll is a well-knownRead MoreAn Analysis Of Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde1729 Words   |  7 PagesTaking a Closer Look into the Story and Author of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Nothing Mr. Stevenson has written as yet has so strongly impressed us with the versatility of his very original genius. An anonymous review in â€Å"The Times† noted Robert Louis Stevenson for his intelligence in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The review continued with saying that the story, be read as a finished study in the art of fantastic literature. Whoever was the anonymous person to state these things aboutRead MoreAnalysis of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Essay557 Words   |  3 PagesAnalysis of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Everyone has heard of Jekyll and Hyde. The two infamous characters that portray the main roles in The Strange Case of Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde. Yet, even with this phenomenal status of the book, surprisingly, not many people know what is really represented inside its pages. Firstly, to understand what made The Strange Case of Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde a classical story known by young and old alike, we must look at where it began. AsRead MoreCharacter Analysis On Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde.Jean Paul1213 Words   |  5 PagesCharacter Analysis on Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Jean Paul Richter defines doppelgà ¤ngers as â€Å"people who see themselves.† One would think that such would be the case for the two main characters in the book The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, but it is quite the opposite (until the end of the novel when the reader finds out that the two main characters are in fact one). Dr. Jekyll creates Mr. Hyde in the hopes of expelling evilness and temptation from himself,

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Cancer Screening Program-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignment

Question: Critical analysis of a National Health Promotion Programme. Answer: Overview of the Program The burden of cancer in Australia, as is in the rest of the world has been increasing. Governments through community initiatives have attempted to solve the issue of increasing incidences of bowel cancer and allocating funds towards the related initiative. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia was rolled out in 2006 with the aim of having screened all the Australians who are between 50 and 74 years before the year 2020[1]. This program is currently in its third phase has already achieved over 70% of its targeted population. The program has however experienced some challenges and problems along the over 10n years, which have led to interventions by the federal and territorial governments[2]. This paper is an analysis of the program which aims at exploring the program from the perspective of the political process that led to its inception, the progress made in the last decade the program has been running, changes and impacts of the program to the identified health co ncern. The Background of the Program Bowel cancer has been regarded as one of the leading causes of death and morbidity in the Australian population. Regardless of the state or territory, all people are at relatively high risk of developing bowel cancer due to the foods being consumed and the lifestyle the people have adopted[3]. According to the cancer statistics worldwide, Australia has the second-highest bowel cancer incidence globally. The local statistics have also indicated that more than 16,000 people in Australia are found to have bowel cancer annually, and over 93% of them are above the age of 50 years[4]. Among the Australian, one in every 19 men and 1 in every 30 women have the possibility to get bowel cancer after they are 50 years. These statistics indicate that Australian levels of government must ensure that the disease is controlled from early stages. Although 90% of the bowel cancer cases can be successfully treated if diagnosed in good time, in 2003, 80 Australians died every week due to bowel cancer-r elated complications[5]. This is due to the lack of governmental initiative in health promotion[6]. The program was therefore established to focus directly on the healthy population and prevent them from being part of the negative statistics. The tangible target of the program is to screen all Australians above the age of 50 years by the year 2020. This will ensure that cases of bowel cancer are detected early enough to allow speedy treatment and recovery[7]. It is expected that with full implementation, the program can save up to 500 lives each year. According to experts, it is highly possible for a disease like bowel cancer to develop and progress inside the body of a human being without having any physical signs or symptoms. This means that the disease often is diagnosed during its late stages if the person is to rely on physical symptoms or warning signs[8]. This has justified the need for a screening program for bowel cancer and also other types of cancer. Diagnostic screening for bowel cancer, as is done in this program entails capturing people who are within the vulnerable and susceptible population but have no symptoms of the disease. This follows a comprehensive and extensive health education to enlighten and educate the people on the health promotion program. The intention of the screening is to look for polyps or traces of cancer cells within the persons fecal material. The screening process makes use of a test that identifies even the smallest traces of blood in the bowel motion. This test, Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOB T) can be conducted in ones home. Blood traces are indications of exfoliated bowels and may be an indication of possible bowel cancer. The program, therefore, has an objective to increase the number of people who have bowel cancer detected and treated early. The Policy Process for the initiation of the Program The Australian report on bowel cancer in the early twenty-first century triggered the public concern for the disease. By the year 2002, stakeholders in public health had already demonstrated their concerns for the increased incidence of the disease as well as the ballooning disease burden related to bowel cancers. This led to the beginning of extensive research on the problem with research evidence from various areas indicating the weight of the problem from the perspective of the community. The research evidence also triggered the public advocacy and activism that led to the preparation of the initial policy document aimed at proposing a nation-wide screening program. This initiative was well received by the policy makers and stakeholders in the healthcare industry and the first program was initiated. This program was pilot-tested in 2003[9]. The program, arranged into three phases brought about an agreement between the Australian Government and the states and territory governments in the implementation and operation of the screening program[10]. The Victorian Department of Health and Human Services was offered the responsibility to implement the program in Victoria as other departments in each of the rest of the states undertook their responsibilities[11]. This enabled a complete roll-over of the program in the whole country and also made it easy to monitor the program from the local levels. However, there was a national program committee that receives reports from all other stakeholders and takes appropriate actions to ensure the program remains on course[12]. The national committee has also been tasked with the responsibility to mobilize communities, train the caregivers and screening professionals as well as mobilizing and allocating crucial resources. These resources are collectively provided by the national, state and territorial government through the combined effort initiative. In additional to the governments, the program also welcomes other stakeholders including non-governmental organizations and individual citizens who feel that they can donate to the course. The link to the donation and fundraisers are available on the program's website. Currently, the budgetary allocation to the program accounts for up to 55% of the annual expenditure of the program while the rest comes from other stakeholders and international donors. The first phase of the project began in August 2007 and ran until 30th June 2008. This was the initialization phase which also set the ground for further engagement. The target ages for the project were fifty-five and 65 years. Phase 2 was conducted between 1st July 2008 and 30th June 2013 was a bit longer than the first phase and the eligible ages were 50, 55 and 65 years. It is during this time that the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program funding was commenced as the program started to take roots and bear fruits. The program is currently in its third phase which started in July 2013 and expected to run until 2020. It is expected that by then, over for million Australians will have been invited to the program every year and over 500 lives saved following early detection of the disease and subsequent treatment[13]. The Impacts of the Program The program has been effectively reduced the incidence of bowel cancer in the country. The program offers free bowel cancer screening to all the people who are eligible, based on their age and relative risks. The positive results of this program have been the introduction of home-based testing kits that are availed to all the eligible persons. This has increased the ability and willingness of the people to conduct their tests at home and only go to the doctor if the results of the home test are positive[14]. On such occasions, the doctor refers the person for deeper investigations. This entails colonoscopy where appropriate and comprehensive clinical assessment. The program, therefore, offers timely access to diagnosis and treatment which then increase the likelihood of the full treatment. The other benefit is that all Participants regardless of the outcome of the home-test are provided with opportunities for follow-up[15]. Follow-up allows the experts to evaluate changes in the pers ons health and their response to treatment. The participants, therefore, become part of the program from their entry and for the rest of their lives, ensuring contact with healthcare professionals for inquiry about their health concerns even unrelated to bowel cancer[16]. The program has however suffered several challenges since its inception. First, there has been a deep concern for the availability of funds that are necessary for the program. As earlier noted, the budgetary allocation for the project accounts for just above half the annual expenditure of the project. The implication of this is that the other half has to be donated. Donations depend largely on the global economic environment. Following the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the program suffered a major setback especially in the second part of Phase two. This necessitated an increase in the budgetary allocation into the program but still did not allow the program to fully meet its objectives. The second challenge which has led to barriers to implementation is the public awareness of the existence of the project. According to a review report published after the first phase only about 23% of the people within the target, ages had access to information on the program. This meant that the progra m could not meet its targeted people unless an awareness creation program was initiated. This also necessitated allocation of more funds to public health education and promotion that was conducted in all the territories and especially in the rural areas. It has also been reported that to date, the usability of the home-testing kits is still not clear to many people[17]. There are cases of failed tests and false positive tests that have been reported which often lead to erroneous statistics that have resulted to false alarms. However, with follow-up, these cases are easily cleared. Despite these challenges and barriers to effective implementation, the successes of the program are more impacting to the community health[18]. The success of the program offers an opportunity for public health learning. The lessons from this program are to be applied in other health promotion programs focusing on different other health concerns such as other types of cancers and ailments. In addition, the program has also allowed the stakeholders in the public health and health promotion sector to interact closely with the community, and this will form a good foundation for further interaction in programs and research related to different health conditions or health situations[19]. There is, therefore, the opportunity for more extensive and focused research on the issues as well as a deeper understanding of the community health from a perspective of knowledge and experience[20]. To the government, the program has continually provided data on the health status and concerns of the tar get cohort. This information will be valuable in future policy direction and guiding the decision and policy-making at the state, territory or even the national level. Summary Health promotion focuses directly on the community initiatives towards the prevention of illness and disability. The primary level of prevention as identified in primary health care entails health education, screening of people and prevention education to help prevent illnesses. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program was initiated to run for over ten years with a focus on increasing the public awareness of the problem associated with bowel cancer and conducting screening programs on eligible persons. The program was informed by the increased incidence of the disease in Australia and the related deaths from the condition. Further, expert reports indicated that if diagnosed early enough over 90% of the patients with bowel cancer can be fully treated[21]. The program, since its inception, has been able to attract and screen over 10 million Australians and will continue to do so until 2020. With the screening, people have been treated for the condition, and an average of 500 deaths have been prevented each year[22]. The future of the program is therefore based on the follow-up that will be given to those who have been found and treated as well as those with familial or genetic predisposition. The program can also be implemented for other conditions with the aim of replicating the successes. Bibliography AIHWAACR, Cancer in Australia: An Overview, 2012 (2012) vol Cat. no. C Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cancer in Australia [2001] Cancer 141 Christou, Aliki, Judith M Katzenellenbogen and Sandra C Thompson, Australias National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Does It Work for Indigenous Australians? (2010) 10(1) BMC public health 373 https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/373 Ee, Hooi C and John K Olynyk, Making Sense of Differing Bowel Cancer Screening Guidelines (2009) 190(7) Medical Journal of Australia 348 Flitcroft, KL et al, A Comparative Case Study of Bowel Cancer Screening in the UK and Australia: Evidence Lost in Translation? (2011) 18(4) Journal of medical screening 193 https://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3466604tool=pmcentrezrendertype=abstract Foreman, Linda, Bowel Cancer Screening--a Role for General Practice. (2009) 38(4) Australian family physician 200 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19350068 Jalleh, G et al, Efficacy of Bowel Cancer Appeals for Promoting Physical Activity (2005) 16(2) Health Promotion Journal of Australia 107 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMeddopt=Citationlist_uids=16130584 Jalleh, Geoffrey et al, Beliefs about Bowel Cancer among the Target Group for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia (2010) 34(2) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 187 Javanparast, Sara et al, Barriers to and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Different Population Subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia (2012) 196(8) Medical Journal of Australia 521 Martini, Angelita et al, Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural and Remote Areas: Analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Data for South Australia. (2005) 11(2) Rural and Remote Health 1648 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21590571 Martini, Angelita et al, Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural and Remote Areas: Analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Data for South Australia. (2008) 11(2) Rural and remote health 1648 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592859 Millard, FB, Bowel Cancer Screening in Australia (2006) 35(4) Aust Fam Physician 188 Smith, Sian K et al, A Decision Aid to Support Informed Choices about Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Low Education: Randomised Controlled Trial. (2010) 341(2) BMJ (Clinical research ed.) c5370 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20978060%5Cnhttps://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2965151 Varlow, M et al, Self-Reported Participation and Beliefs about Bowel Cancer Screening in New South Wales, Australia (2014) 25(2) Health Promotion Journal of Australia 97 https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JSCSC=YNEWS=NPAGE=fulltextD=medlAN=25017447%5Cnhttps://gw2jh3xr2c.search.serialssolutions.com?url_ver=Z39.88-2004rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journalrfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:medlrft.genre=articlerft_id=info:doi Ward, Paul R, Cushla Coffey and Samantha Meyer, Trust, Choice and Obligation: A Qualitative Study of Enablers of Colorectal Cancer Screening in South Australia (2015) 37(7) Sociology of Health and Illness 988 Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, National Bowel Cancer Screening Project (2011) Author https://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/bowel-about Flitcroft, Kathy L et al, Fifteen Years of Bowel Cancer Screening Policy in Australia: Putting Evidence into Practice? 37 NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (2013) NHS Cancer screening programmes websi NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (2013) NHS Cancer screening programmes website. Angelita Martini et al, Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural and Remote Areas: Analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Data for South Australia. (2005) 11(2) Rural and Remote Health 1648 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21590571. Hooi C Ee and John K Olynyk, Making Sense of Differing Bowel Cancer Screening Guidelines (2009) 190(7) Medical Journal of Australia 348. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, National Bowel Cancer Screening Project (2011) Author https://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/bowel-about. Paul R Ward, Cushla Coffey and Samantha Meyer, Trust, Choice and Obligation: A Qualitative Study of Enablers of Colorectal Cancer Screening in South Australia (2015) 37(7) Sociology of Health and Illness 988. Sara Javanparast et al, Barriers to and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Different Population Subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia (2012) 196(8) Medical Journal of Australia 521. Sian K Smith et al, A Decision Aid to Support Informed Choices about Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Low Education: Randomised Controlled Trial. (2010) 341(2) BMJ (Clinical research ed.) c5370 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20978060%5Cnhttps://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2965151. Linda Foreman, Bowel Cancer Screening--a Role for General Practice. (2009) 38(4) Australian family physician 200 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19350068. M Varlow et al, Self-Reported Participation and Beliefs about Bowel Cancer Screening in New South Wales, Australia (2014) 25(2) Health Promotion Journal of Australia 97 https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JSCSC=YNEWS=NPAGE=fulltextD=medlAN=25017447%5Cnhttps://gw2jh3xr2c.search.serialssolutions.com?url_ver=Z39.88-2004rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journalrfr_id=info:sid/Ovid:medlrft.genre=articlerft_id=info:doi. Smith et al. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cancer in Australia [2001] Cancer 141. G Jalleh et al, Efficacy of Bowel Cancer Appeals for Promoting Physical Activity (2005) 16(2) Health Promotion Journal of Australia 107 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMeddopt=Citationlist_uids=16130584. Kathy L Flitcroft et al, Fifteen Years of Bowel Cancer Screening Policy in Australia: Putting Evidence into Practice? 37. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aliki Christou, Judith M Katzenellenbogen and Sandra C Thompson, Australias National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Does It Work for Indigenous Australians? (2010) 10(1) BMC public health 373 https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/373. FB Millard, Bowel Cancer Screening in Australia (2006) 35(4) Aust Fam Physician 188. KL Flitcroft et al, A Comparative Case Study of Bowel Cancer Screening in the UK and Australia: Evidence Lost in Translation? (2011) 18(4) Journal of medical screening 193 https://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3466604tool=pmcentrezrendertype=abstract. Jalleh et al, Efficacy of Bowel Cancer Appeals for Promoting Physical Activity. AIHWAACR, Cancer in Australia: An Overview, 2012 (2012) vol Cat. no. C. Angelita Martini et al, Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural and Remote Areas: Analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Data for South Australia. (2008) 11(2) Rural and remote health 1648 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592859. Geoffrey Jalleh et al, Beliefs about Bowel Cancer among the Target Group for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia (2010) 34(2) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 187. AIHWAACR.